
We were delighted to attend a seminar on The Last Week at St. Peter’s Episcopal Cathedral, St. Petersburg, Florida, March 27 through March 28, and hear Dr. Crossan (or Dominic, his preferred form of address) preach during services on Sunday, March 29.
Highlights are summarized below. Thanks to my husband Tony Napodano for his photograph of my book signing. My thanks also to John Rehg for contributing his notes and photographs.
The Matrix of Mark, Friday evening
The matarix is four-sided: time and place; vision and tradition. The Gospel of Mark was written for refugees fleeing the destruction of the Temple in 66 C.E. The author’s audience was Jewish Christians living under the domination of the Roman Empire. How tragically they were disappointed when God did not return to save them; some 6,000 perished as they ran back into their burning Temple.
These people were desperately hoping for what Crossan terms “apocalyptic eschatology” from Greek, meaning a revelation of the end of evil on earth, i.e., the death and destruction wielded by the Empire. Mark’s Jesus had a radical message: “The Kingdom of God is here and now, and human beings are called to cooperate with God in bringing about a new world.” (collaborative eschatology) This new belief system hardly set well with Rome. Indeed, it was tantamount to sedition, as it conflicted with the Empire’s pagan ideology of peace and justice existing somewhere else after death and only as the aftermath of military/violent victory of the Empire. God cannot be violent if he has invited us to participate in the eschaton. We are called to collaborate non-violently with a non-violent God. In other words, when we collaborate with God, things happen.
In the first century, the Gospel writers and Paul expected the Kingdom to arrive ’soon,’ that God would clean up all our messes, and all were wrong. We’re still getting it wrong today. Are we refusing collaborative eschatology?
The title “Son of Man” is Mark’s favorite for Jesus. It is a grander title than “Son of God,” (also used to describe Roman emperors) because Jesus represents all of humanity. He has earthly authority.
When asked what this authority looked like, Crossan replied that rather than assume a punitive authority —a punishing, then forgiving God as the basis for Jesus’ authority—we should consider human consequences and take responsibility for ourselves rather than be guilt-ridden and beg forgiveness.
“Sin” (the etymology of the word = missing the mark) is about violence, not sexuality. The first act out of Eden was fratricide, remember.
Crossan contrasted the “programs” of John the Baptizer and Jesus:
John: God is coming soon Jesus: God is here now; participate
John: God is coming violently (punitive) Jesus: God is not punitive
John: all depend on the Baptizer Jesus: “franchising”: send disciples/apostles out to initiate others into the Kingdom of God
John: be ready for God to do it Jesus: collaborate with God
John Dominic Crossan notes an “acute disinterest” by Jesus in life after death. He suggests looking at the Lord’s Prayer for key interests:
Our Father, who art in heaven,
hallowed be thy name;
Thy kingdom come,
thy will be done,
on earth as it is in heaven.
Give us this day our daily bread,
and forgive us our trespasses,
as we forgive those who trespass against us.
And lead us not into temptation,
but deliver us from evil,
for thine is the kingdom, the power,
and the glory forever. Amen.
The prayer’s focus is taking the world back for God (as it is God’s world) through peace, justice, and non-violent resistance to Empire values. We were to ensure justice for all, food for all, care for all.

During a Q&A, I asked Dominic how he interpreted the fact that Jesus never baptized anyone. The answer was rich. First of all, the ritual performed by John the Baptizer had nothing to do with the one practiced today. It was, in fact, a sacramental re-enactment of Exodus. Baptism as described by Paul heralded a return to the dawn of creation, when nothing existed but the ‘waters of chaos.’ (The wild sea was a powerful symbol of chaos and destruction in early Judaism.) The full immersion into water, symbolizing the ‘chaos’ of one’s former life before baptism (for John only the Jordan River would do), followed by one’s emergence symbolized a new creation, not the “washing away of sins.” For Crossan, this interpretation of baptism trivializes a sacred rite.
Leland Somers remarked of Paul’s use of the term “new creation” as also meaning a new creation of the Christian community as a nucleus for the Kingdom of God. Crossan agreed emphatically: The new creation is always personal and cosmic; never private.
Such a radical vision of justice was admitted (“yes, we really need to do this”) and then subverted (“Well, it’s really beyond my comfort zone to take care of this, do that — what? Feed a beggar? Heal on the sabbath?”) But indeed, such behavior was part of Jesus’ program.
Somers asked another dramatic question, which must be paraphrased. “Has the Church been deliberately turned upside down?” The answer was respectfully, classically Crossan. Again, I paraphrase, but the answer was “Kinda. Yeah. We’ve all done it.”
Friday evening concluded with a poignant reminder: The center of Christianity is not a book (i.e., the Bible) but a person, i.e., Jesus of Nazareth. “We are washed in the blood of the lamb, not the ink of the lamb,” Crossan joked, but his humor was laden with meaning.
Next: The Disciples in Mark’s Gospel